- Many images on the net are hoaxes.
- 911 conspiracy is unfalsifiablee. Theology.
- UOV's don't exist. A visiting spacecraft from another planet will have enormous mass and the jet engines reacting to gravitational field will make much more noise than a F14 Tomcat, it will sound like a nuclear explosion. All of the eyewitness account have one thing in common: nobody heard anything. Thus whatever it was, it had no mass. "special" alien technology, not making a noise is not falsifiable. Space aliens
Age of rocks Edit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU (Bill Nye Ken Ham debate), 1h56min Meteorite used to date rocks under the Induction assumption that the meteor is 4.5bil years old, classic example of circular reasoning.
Designed rock Baltic sea Edit
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ls7Qb37FxiA Movie about the rock
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNgOwIiJ68Y Better video
Giant skulls Edit
- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2063486/Alien-skull-Peru-Mystery-giant-headed-mummy-city-Andahuaylillas.html Huge giant skull
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNm3jeCPaA We have evidence of the Nephilim. Who were the Nephilim? L.A. Marzulli has long searched for physical evidence of the Nephilim, the giants of the Bible. A significant cover-up over the years moved these hybrid humans to the dustbins of history. But now evidence has been found in Peru and the U.S.A. In this video by Marzulli he shows the skull with red hear that cannot be Homo Sapiens, as all humans have the same skull pattern , while these elongated skulls don't. The pharaohs also had elongated skulls. Genetic tests done on a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharaoh mummy showed that he had red hair' and was a white caucasian(Swedish, Norwegian blue eyed complexion) . Same with China pyramids , white people built them, found a caucasian large mummy in china Sun Gods where white people with blue eyes that gave the technology before the flood and were killed by God for leaving their abode in the stars, most probably the constellation of Orion which is where Giza points to.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOSbRCg0B4g Star child, DNA is not human. Skull is just as strange as the Peru one above.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-RL-BxO7Xk Forbidden History: The Mystery of Ancient Sardinian Giants
- http://www.starchildproject.com , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okkhfAt_jTs
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe6DN1OoxjE 3mil views
- http://circlemp3.com/go-suppressed-archeological-mysteries city 3km below earth , mine shaft shutdown .
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uExYzh89MQI Perfect round holes through solid rock. http://www.hiddenincatours.com by Brien Foerster
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zz8_MxcnzY 2mil views
The Cassini spacecraft detected what appear to be lakes and ponds near Titan's equator. If so, one lake is almost forty miles long, 25 miles wide, and at least three feet deep. Natural processes on the moon's surface rain down methane mixed with hydrocarbons, but only near the poles. Near the moon's equator, natural processes evaporate the methane. So, after many millennia, any ancient equatorial methane lakes on Titan should have completely dried. The methane lakes' continued presence baffles astronomers, leaving them to face the difficult task of explaining it.
Age of earth Edit
steven boyd book thousands..... not billions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_correlation_theory disagrees with the Orion link. There are no http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_hieroglyphs found in Giza pyramid.
radioactive decay of helium from uranium indicates sev 100 thousands
dawkins wrote: ".....Milton misunderstands the first thing about natural selection. He thinks the phrase refers to selection among species. In fact, modern Darwinians agree with Darwin himself that natural selection chooses among individuals within species. Such a fundamental misunderstanding would be bound to have far-reaching consequences; and they duly make nonsense of several sections of the book.
Review of Richard Milton: The Facts of Life: Shattering the myth of Darwinism. Published in New Statesman, (London), 28th August 1992.
Every day I get letters, in capitals and obsessively underlined if not actually in green ink, from flat-earthers, young-earthers, perpetual-motion merchants, astrologers and other harmless fruitcakes. The only difference here is that Richard Milton managed to get his stuff published. The publisher - we don’t know how many decent publishers turned it down first - is called ‘Fourth Estate.’ Not a house that I had heard of, but apparently neither a vanity press nor a fundamentalist front. So, what are ‘Fourth Estate’ playing at? Would they publish - for this book is approximately as silly - a claim that the Romans never existed and the Latin language is a cunning Victorian fabrication to keep schoolmasters employed?
A cynic might note that there is a paying public out there, hungry for simple religious certitude, who will lap up anything with a subtitle like ‘Shattering the Myth of Darwinism.’ If the author pretends not to be religious himself, so much the better, for he can then be exhibited as an unbiased witness. There is - no doubt about it - a fast buck to be made by any publishers unscrupulous enough to print pseudoscience that they know is rubbish but for which there is a market.
But let’s not be so cynical. Mightn’t the publishers have an honourable defence? Perhaps this unqualified hack is a solitary genius, the only soldier in the entire platoon - nay, regiment - who is in step. Perhaps the world really did bounce into existence in 8000 BC. Perhaps the whole vast edifice of orthodox science really is totally and utterly off its trolley. (In the present case, it would have to be not just orthodox biology but physics, geology and cosmology too). How do we poor publishers know until we have printed the book and seen it panned?
If you find that plea persuasive, think again. It could be used to justify publishing literally anything; flat-earth, fairies, astrology, werewolves and all. It is true that an occasional lonely figure, originally written off as loony or at least wrong, has eventually been triumphantly vindicated (though not often a journalist like Richard Milton, it has to be said). But it is also true that a much larger number of people originally regarded as wrong really were wrong. To be worth publishing, a book must do a little more than just be out of step with the rest of the world.
But, the wretched publisher might plead, how are we, in our ignorance, to decide? Well, the first thing you might do - it might even pay you, given the current runaway success of some science books - is employ an editor with a smattering of scientific education. It needn’t be much: A-level Biology would have been ample to see off Richard Milton. At a more serious level, there are lots of smart young science graduates who would love a career in publishing (and their jacket blurbs would avoid egregious howlers like calling Darwinism the "idea that chance is the mechanism of evolution.") As a last resort you could even do what proper publishers do and send the stuff out to referees. After all, if you were offered a manuscript claiming that Tennyson wrote The Iliad, wouldn’t you consult somebody, say with an O-level in History, before rushing into print?
You might also glance for a second at the credentials of the author. If he is an unknown journalist, innocent of qualifications to write his book, you don’t have to reject it out of hand but you might be more than usually anxious to show it to referees who do have some credentials. Acceptance need not, of course, depend on the referees’ endorsing the author’s thesis: a serious dissenting opinion can deserve to be heard. But referees will save you the embarrassment of putting your imprint on twaddle that betrays, on almost every page, complete and total pig-ignorance of the subject at hand.
All qualified physicists, biologists, cosmologists and geologists agree, on the basis of massive, mutually corroborating evidence, that the earth’s age is at least four billion years. Richard Milton thinks it is only a few thousand years old, on the authority of various Creation ‘science’ sources including the notorious Henry Morris (Milton himself claims not to be religious, and he affects not to recognise the company he is keeping). The great Francis Crick (himself not averse to rocking boats) recently remarked that "anyone who believes that the earth is less than 10,000 years old needs psychiatric help." Yes yes, maybe Crick and the rest of us are all wrong and Milton, an untrained amateur with a ‘background’ as an engineer, will one day have the last laugh. Want a bet?
Milton misunderstands the first thing about natural selection. He thinks the phrase refers to selection among species. In fact, modern Darwinians agree with Darwin himself that natural selection chooses among individuals within species. Such a fundamental misunderstanding would be bound to have far-reaching consequences; and they duly make nonsense of several sections of the book.
In genetics, the word ‘recessive’ has a precise meaning, known to every school biologist. It means a gene whose effect is masked by another (dominant) gene at the same locus. Now it also happens that large stretches of chromosomes are inert - untranslated. This kind of inertness has not the smallest connection with the ‘recessive’ kind. Yet Milton manages the feat of confusing the two. Any slightly qualified referee would have picked up this clanger.
There are other errors from which any reader capable of thought would have saved this book. Stating correctly that Immanuel Velikovsky was ridiculed in his own time, Milton goes on to say "Today, only forty years later, a concept closely similar to Velikovsky’s is widely accepted by many geologists - that the major extinction at the end of the Cretaceous ... was caused by collison with a giant meteor or even asteroid." But the whole point of Velikovsky (indeed, the whole reason why Milton, with his eccentric views on the age of the earth, champions him) is that his collision was supposed to have happened recently; recently enough to explain Biblical catastrophes like Moses’s parting of the Red Sea. The geologists’ meteorite, on the other hand, is supposed to have impacted 65 million years ago! There is a difference - approximately 65 million years difference. If Velikovsky had placed his collision tens of millions of years ago he would not have been ridiculed. To represent him as a misjudged, wilderness-figure who has finally come into his own is either disingenuous or - more charitably and plausibly - stupid.
In these post-Leakey, post-Johanson days, creationist preachers are having to learn that there is no mileage in ‘missing links.’ Far from being missing, the fossil links between modern humans and our ape ancestors now constitute an elegantly continuous series. Richard Milton, however, still hasn’t got the message. For him, "...the only ‘missing link’ so far discovered remains the bogus Piltdown Man." Australopithecus, correctly described as a human body with an ape’s head, doesn’t qualify because it is ‘really’ an ape. And Homo habilis - ‘handy man’ - which has a brain "perhaps only half the size of the average modern human’s" is ruled out from the other side: "... the fact remains that handy man is a human - not a missing link." One is left wondering what a fossil has to do - what more could a fossil do - to qualify as a ‘missing link’?
No matter how continuous a fossil series may be, the conventions of zoological nomenclature will always impose discontinuous names. At present, there are only two generic names to spread over all the hominids. The more ape-like ones are shoved into the genus Australopithecus; the more human ones into the genus Homo. Intermediates are saddled with one name or the other. This would still be true if the series were as smoothly continuous as you can possibly imagine. So, when Milton says, of Johanson’s ‘Lucy’ and associated fossils, "the finds have been referred to either Australopithecus and hence are apes, or Homo and hence are human," he is saying something (rather dull) about naming conventions, nothing at all about the real world.
But this is a more sophisticated criticism than Milton’s book deserves. The only serious question raised by its publication is why. As for would-be purchasers, if you want this sort of silly-season drivel you’d be better off with a couple of Jehovah’s Witness tracts. They are more amusing to read, they have rather sweet pictures, and they put their religious cards on the table.
brad steiger Edit
Author Brad Steiger, "Worlds before our own"
Nevada citizen Aug.5 1947 Nine feet tall men found 6min
New York times 1925, June 20 Skeletons 12 feet tall found in cave mexico city but searching ntimes brings zero.
Jim Marrs book .. ruled by secrecy ..
Lost civ Edit
Peter Lillback, The providence forum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9ivUMErK-I Could This Be Atlantis? Pyramids Found in Waters Off Cuba
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xokMcO3T0SY earth not spin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaQr-G-YPW0 YEC debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO6XnnjUPa4 ancient bird menoa found in new zealand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs charleston heston forbid archeology
1. tilt of the earth's axis changed during the flood , that is why the solstice is misaligned
Spheres Klerksdorp south africa in rock solid min
Micheael Cremo Forbidden archeology , richard Thompson
Virginia Steen-McCantyre archeology http://pleistocenecoalition.com/steen-mcintyre/index.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtB7iUw090w age of earth wazooloo dynamo theoryl, moon magnetic field
dinosaur skin intact after 70mil years 23min
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4 forbidden archeology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mHe211mLV0 anceint technology 2mil views
not watched yet.
http://www.livescience.com/25743-alien-like-skulls-excavated-mexico.html Giants deformed skulls same as tutenkhamen.
200 cities under water in mediteranian
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLaYU9T_BWA stones ludite with designs we cannot make today.
King David Edit
forbid arch Edit
Richard Thompson , forbidden archeology
Christopher Dunn, author of The Giza Power Plant
Patrick Flanagan, author Pyramid Power impedence of pyramid cone 377ohms , that of free space. Impediance of apex of pyramid is 377ohms.
Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles Series
Virginia Steen-Mcintire , mexico spear points dated 200,000
Hundreds of spheres found in precambrian era Klerksdorp SA
Richard Milton , Shattering the myths of Darwin.
Robert Bauval , the Orion conspiracy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooy2LTJoMVM&feature=related pyramid 1,5mil views 49min
Dennis Dormion, The Room of Cheops
rainer stadelmann, discovered pyramidion exactly 1m at cheops pyramid
divide the lenght by the width = pi
survace of the 4 sides , divived by surface of the base = golden ratio
divide half perimeter by total hight = golden squared = g+1 = g*g
upper chamber dimensions are multiples of the golden ratio.
Dustin Carr physicist
Claude Genzling , polytechniqe Graduate
Jean leclant Dea of egyptology
Thierry de Champris, book The geometric verb"
Cheops pyramideon is exact scale model of pyramid at giza.
Agathargiz 2000 years ago argued ....
atronomer and priest TH Moreux in his book La Science Mysterieuse Des pharaons
subtract inner circel from outer = speed of light in 299,72 meters
author - David hatcher childres the lost cities series of books
colin wilson, From atlantis to the sphinx
richard Noone, Author of book 5/5/2000 . Uses hydrolic techniques to set stones using water pressure. edward concel desiphered .
Gerald Hawkins mathematician, stonehenge could predict moon and solar eclipses
In 17th century william stookley and john aubreyn noted that ancient sites perfectly alligned along straight tracks. Alfred Watkins photographs discovered the ley system of straight lines connecting sites. studied by author John Michell, author of The New View Over Atlantis
tracks connected othery, trull, cadbury, brent tor, st. Michael's mount
brass couplings found at inca blocks before brass age was supposed to be.
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html radio active decay
Even recently, I became aware of a disturbing magnetic anomaly affecting the Hubble space telescope because the Earth’s magnetic field is decaying. These are circumstantial clues about the youthfulness of some of the Earth’s features (if not the youthfulness of the entire Earth).
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/08/24/newly-discovered-oileating-microbe-flourishing-gulf/ Oil eating bacteria would have consumed all the oil if it were millions of years old.
1. Where did the universe’s original matter come from? 2. How did life begin? 3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the Precambrian and Cambrian periods? 4. Where did the dinosaurs come from? 5. ------------------
creation moments Edit
Notes: John Allen Watson. 1991. "Phosphate Rocks/Bone Phosphates of South Carolina." The Ark Today, VI:5, Nov./Dec., pp. 14-19. Photo: Hadrosaurus, considered to be the first mounted dinosaur skeleton in the world. Today's Featured Product
Breathtaking Birds: Marvels of Creation This beautiful and colorful book showcases the unique characteristics of some of the most amazing birds of the world. Every bird has its special design feature highlighted in both the main text and a "fact box" at the... Find Out More Free Church Bulletin Inserts Free Book
A Swedish expedition team has found an unidentified object at the bottom of the Baltic Sea, leaving some to believe it’s the remnants of an extra-terrestrial ship. Scientists went off on a deep-water dive to debunk some theories about the underwater object, but were left with more questions than they had answers. The divers found that the object was raised about 10 to 13 feet above the seabed, and curved in at the sides. “First we thought this was only stone, but this is something else,” Ocean X team diver Peter Lindberg said in a press release. The object had an egg shaped hole leading into it from the top, working like an opening. On top of the object, they found strange stone circle formations, which resembled small fireplaces. The stones were covered in something that resembled “soot.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_heLdTzKfCY&feature=uploademail mummy with caucusaoid features, predated indian tribes.
graehamhancock.com from youtube
Graham Hancock Presentation at the 2012 Tipping Point Prophets
get teh forbidden archeology coast-to-coast am torrent from piratebay
NOTE:ctc am utters lots of unsubstantiated conjectures, with some interesting facts inbetween.
do a search on the username uploader
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ0ViMVxKZA&feature=related 12000 old structure
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25723-massive-ocean-discovered-towards-earths-core A reservoir of water three times the volume of all the oceans has been discovered deep beneath the Earth’s surface. The finding could help explain where Earth’s seas came from.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BlbujJbbJo Ten unexplained mysteries, vanished mummy, iron pillar delhi,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVSx2wTZ3UU Dinosaurs and Humans lived contemporaneously. Trex soft tissue found.
Forbidden archaeology Cremo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hEnGnFwoAw , http://lah.ru/index-eng.htm Huge Underground Megaliths discovered in Caucasus, Russia. Vadim Chernobrov expedition. Stones stacked similar in proximity as the Giza Pyramid blocks, nothing can be inserted between them. Underground structure shape(like a bottle) ,huge blocks 3x2 m, It was built above ground , but got buried under ground by some event(probably Noah's flood). These underground chambers are the same size as Giza and have narrow passages similar to Giza, that can only be explored by small mobile robots. 25min (possible hoax, the other videos are absurd, no GPS coordinates given etc..)
http://talc.site88.net/mega.htm site88 megalithic structures