FANDOM


Reality check on the links Edit

  • Many images on the net are hoaxes.
  • 911 conspiracy is unfalsifiablee. Theology.
  • UOV's don't exist. A visiting spacecraft from another planet will have enormous mass and the jet engines reacting to gravitational field will make much more noise than a F14 Tomcat, it will sound like a nuclear explosion. All of the eyewitness account have one thing in common: nobody heard anything. Thus whatever it was, it had no mass. "special" alien technology, not making a noise is not falsifiable. Space aliens

Age of rocks Edit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU (Bill Nye Ken Ham debate), 1h56min Meteorite used to date rocks under the Induction assumption that the meteor is 4.5bil years old, classic example of circular reasoning.

Designed rock Baltic sea Edit

Giant skulls  Edit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNm3jeCPaA We have evidence of the Nephilim. Who were the Nephilim? L.A. Marzulli has long searched for physical evidence of the Nephilim, the giants of the Bible. A significant cover-up over the years moved these hybrid humans to the dustbins of history. But now evidence has been found in Peru and the U.S.A. In this video by Marzulli he shows the skull with red hear that cannot be Homo Sapiens, as all humans have the same skull pattern , while these elongated skulls don't. The pharaohs also had elongated skulls. Genetic tests done on a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharaoh mummy showed that he had red hair' and was a white caucasian(Swedish, Norwegian blue eyed complexion) .  Same with China pyramids , white people built them, found a caucasian large mummy in china Sun Gods where white people with blue eyes that gave the technology before the flood and were killed by God for leaving their abode in the stars, most probably the constellation of Orion which is where Giza points to.

ICR Edit

http://www.icr.org/article/6910/

The Cassini spacecraft detected what appear to be lakes and ponds near Titan's equator. If so, one lake is almost forty miles long, 25 miles wide, and at least three feet deep. Natural processes on the moon's surface rain down methane mixed with hydrocarbons, but only near the poles. Near the moon's equator, natural processes evaporate the methane. So, after many millennia, any ancient equatorial methane lakes on Titan should have completely dried. The methane lakes' continued presence baffles astronomers, leaving them to face the difficult task of explaining it.

Age of earth Edit

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=mike+riddle+youtube+&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=


steven boyd book thousands..... not billions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_correlation_theory disagrees with the Orion link. There are no http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_hieroglyphs found in Giza pyramid. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=9j_lA9eWlFQ age earth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=7Wr-lXLGCxQ

radioactive decay of helium from uranium indicates sev 100 thousands

http://web.archive.org/web/20071028190957/http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Reviews/1992-08-28shattering_the_myths.shtml


dawkins wrote: ".....Milton misunderstands the first thing about natural selection. He thinks the phrase refers to selection among species. In fact, modern Darwinians agree with Darwin himself that natural selection chooses among individuals within species. Such a fundamental misunderstanding would be bound to have far-reaching consequences; and they duly make nonsense of several sections of the book.



Review of Richard Milton: The Facts of Life: Shattering the myth of Darwinism. Published in New Statesman, (London), 28th August 1992.

Every day I get letters, in capitals and obsessively underlined if not actually in green ink, from flat-earthers, young-earthers, perpetual-motion merchants, astrologers and other harmless fruitcakes. The only difference here is that Richard Milton managed to get his stuff published. The publisher - we don’t know how many decent publishers turned it down first - is called ‘Fourth Estate.’ Not a house that I had heard of, but apparently neither a vanity press nor a fundamentalist front. So, what are ‘Fourth Estate’ playing at? Would they publish - for this book is approximately as silly - a claim that the Romans never existed and the Latin language is a cunning Victorian fabrication to keep schoolmasters employed?

A cynic might note that there is a paying public out there, hungry for simple religious certitude, who will lap up anything with a subtitle like ‘Shattering the Myth of Darwinism.’ If the author pretends not to be religious himself, so much the better, for he can then be exhibited as an unbiased witness. There is - no doubt about it - a fast buck to be made by any publishers unscrupulous enough to print pseudoscience that they know is rubbish but for which there is a market.

But let’s not be so cynical. Mightn’t the publishers have an honourable defence? Perhaps this unqualified hack is a solitary genius, the only soldier in the entire platoon - nay, regiment - who is in step. Perhaps the world really did bounce into existence in 8000 BC. Perhaps the whole vast edifice of orthodox science really is totally and utterly off its trolley. (In the present case, it would have to be not just orthodox biology but physics, geology and cosmology too). How do we poor publishers know until we have printed the book and seen it panned?

If you find that plea persuasive, think again. It could be used to justify publishing literally anything; flat-earth, fairies, astrology, werewolves and all. It is true that an occasional lonely figure, originally written off as loony or at least wrong, has eventually been triumphantly vindicated (though not often a journalist like Richard Milton, it has to be said). But it is also true that a much larger number of people originally regarded as wrong really were wrong. To be worth publishing, a book must do a little more than just be out of step with the rest of the world.

But, the wretched publisher might plead, how are we, in our ignorance, to decide? Well, the first thing you might do - it might even pay you, given the current runaway success of some science books - is employ an editor with a smattering of scientific education. It needn’t be much: A-level Biology would have been ample to see off Richard Milton. At a more serious level, there are lots of smart young science graduates who would love a career in publishing (and their jacket blurbs would avoid egregious howlers like calling Darwinism the "idea that chance is the mechanism of evolution.") As a last resort you could even do what proper publishers do and send the stuff out to referees. After all, if you were offered a manuscript claiming that Tennyson wrote The Iliad, wouldn’t you consult somebody, say with an O-level in History, before rushing into print?

You might also glance for a second at the credentials of the author. If he is an unknown journalist, innocent of qualifications to write his book, you don’t have to reject it out of hand but you might be more than usually anxious to show it to referees who do have some credentials. Acceptance need not, of course, depend on the referees’ endorsing the author’s thesis: a serious dissenting opinion can deserve to be heard. But referees will save you the embarrassment of putting your imprint on twaddle that betrays, on almost every page, complete and total pig-ignorance of the subject at hand.

All qualified physicists, biologists, cosmologists and geologists agree, on the basis of massive, mutually corroborating evidence, that the earth’s age is at least four billion years. Richard Milton thinks it is only a few thousand years old, on the authority of various Creation ‘science’ sources including the notorious Henry Morris (Milton himself claims not to be religious, and he affects not to recognise the company he is keeping). The great Francis Crick (himself not averse to rocking boats) recently remarked that "anyone who believes that the earth is less than 10,000 years old needs psychiatric help." Yes yes, maybe Crick and the rest of us are all wrong and Milton, an untrained amateur with a ‘background’ as an engineer, will one day have the last laugh. Want a bet?

Milton misunderstands the first thing about natural selection. He thinks the phrase refers to selection among species. In fact, modern Darwinians agree with Darwin himself that natural selection chooses among individuals within species. Such a fundamental misunderstanding would be bound to have far-reaching consequences; and they duly make nonsense of several sections of the book.

In genetics, the word ‘recessive’ has a precise meaning, known to every school biologist. It means a gene whose effect is masked by another (dominant) gene at the same locus. Now it also happens that large stretches of chromosomes are inert - untranslated. This kind of inertness has not the smallest connection with the ‘recessive’ kind. Yet Milton manages the feat of confusing the two. Any slightly qualified referee would have picked up this clanger.

There are other errors from which any reader capable of thought would have saved this book. Stating correctly that Immanuel Velikovsky was ridiculed in his own time, Milton goes on to say "Today, only forty years later, a concept closely similar to Velikovsky’s is widely accepted by many geologists - that the major extinction at the end of the Cretaceous ... was caused by collison with a giant meteor or even asteroid." But the whole point of Velikovsky (indeed, the whole reason why Milton, with his eccentric views on the age of the earth, champions him) is that his collision was supposed to have happened recently; recently enough to explain Biblical catastrophes like Moses’s parting of the Red Sea. The geologists’ meteorite, on the other hand, is supposed to have impacted 65 million years ago! There is a difference - approximately 65 million years difference. If Velikovsky had placed his collision tens of millions of years ago he would not have been ridiculed. To represent him as a misjudged, wilderness-figure who has finally come into his own is either disingenuous or - more charitably and plausibly - stupid.

In these post-Leakey, post-Johanson days, creationist preachers are having to learn that there is no mileage in ‘missing links.’ Far from being missing, the fossil links between modern humans and our ape ancestors now constitute an elegantly continuous series. Richard Milton, however, still hasn’t got the message. For him, "...the only ‘missing link’ so far discovered remains the bogus Piltdown Man." Australopithecus, correctly described as a human body with an ape’s head, doesn’t qualify because it is ‘really’ an ape. And Homo habilis - ‘handy man’ - which has a brain "perhaps only half the size of the average modern human’s" is ruled out from the other side: "... the fact remains that handy man is a human - not a missing link." One is left wondering what a fossil has to do - what more could a fossil do - to qualify as a ‘missing link’?

No matter how continuous a fossil series may be, the conventions of zoological nomenclature will always impose discontinuous names. At present, there are only two generic names to spread over all the hominids. The more ape-like ones are shoved into the genus Australopithecus; the more human ones into the genus Homo. Intermediates are saddled with one name or the other. This would still be true if the series were as smoothly continuous as you can possibly imagine. So, when Milton says, of Johanson’s ‘Lucy’ and associated fossils, "the finds have been referred to either Australopithecus and hence are apes, or Homo and hence are human," he is saying something (rather dull) about naming conventions, nothing at all about the real world.

But this is a more sophisticated criticism than Milton’s book deserves. The only serious question raised by its publication is why. As for would-be purchasers, if you want this sort of silly-season drivel you’d be better off with a couple of Jehovah’s Witness tracts. They are more amusing to read, they have rather sweet pictures, and they put their religious cards on the table.

Richard Dawkins

Giants Edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9gETsNhL0s


brad steiger Edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-g9sjBNuIw

Author Brad Steiger, "Worlds before our own"

Nevada citizen Aug.5 1947 Nine feet tall men found 6min

New York times 1925, June 20 Skeletons 12 feet tall found in cave mexico city but searching ntimes brings zero.


Jim Marrs book .. ruled by secrecy ..

Lost civ Edit

www.lostcivilizationdvd.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b64s0NAO10

Peter Lillback, The providence forum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9ivUMErK-I Could This Be Atlantis? Pyramids Found in Waters Off Cuba

http://eden-saga.com/en/mythology-giants-gargantua-archeology-giant-fossils-cyclops-giant-footsteps.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2063486/Alien-skull-Peru-Mystery-giant-headed-mummy-city-Andahuaylillas.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0sszxXlzlY daw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xokMcO3T0SY earth not spin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n042X-Fuihg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaQr-G-YPW0 YEC debate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO6XnnjUPa4 ancient bird menoa found in new zealand

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRlCCOUB25U Bimini road at 6min by https://www.youtube.com/user/list25


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs charleston heston forbid archeology

1. tilt of the earth's axis changed during the flood , that is why the solstice is misaligned


Spheres Klerksdorp south africa in rock solid min

Micheael Cremo Forbidden archeology , richard Thompson

Virginia Steen-McCantyre archeology http://pleistocenecoalition.com/steen-mcintyre/index.html


http://www.s8int.com/hueyatlaco.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtB7iUw090w age of earth wazooloo dynamo theoryl, moon magnetic field

dinosaur skin intact after 70mil years 23min


www.creationtruth.org

http://www.youngearthcreation.org/

http://youngearthcreation.org/articles/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4 forbidden archeology


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzmdYVNDC7w pyramids

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mHe211mLV0 anceint technology 2mil views

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGI59_zfibY&NR=1&feature=endscreen Peru pyramids

not watched yet. 


http://www.livescience.com/25743-alien-like-skulls-excavated-mexico.html Giants deformed skulls same as tutenkhamen.

http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1112754510/alien-like-skulls-unearthed-mexico-122712/ skul

http://www.youtube.com/user/PyramidsOfficial


stone Edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvY_QMnmlSI

200 cities under water in mediteranian

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLaYU9T_BWA stones ludite with designs we cannot make today.


King David Edit

KING DAVID

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BEjxNL2neY


forbid arch Edit

Richard Thompson , forbidden archeology

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4&feature=relmfu

Christopher Dunn, author of The Giza Power Plant

Patrick Flanagan, author Pyramid Power impedence of pyramid cone 377ohms , that of free space. Impediance of apex of pyramid is 377ohms.

Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles Series



Virginia Steen-Mcintire , mexico spear points dated 200,000

Hundreds of spheres found in precambrian era Klerksdorp SA

Richard Milton , Shattering the myths of Darwin.

Robert Bauval , the Orion conspiracy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooy2LTJoMVM&feature=related pyramid 1,5mil views 49min

Dennis Dormion, The Room of Cheops

rainer stadelmann, discovered pyramidion exactly 1m at cheops pyramid

divide the lenght by the width = pi

survace of the 4 sides , divived by surface of the base = golden ratio

divide half perimeter by total hight = golden squared = g+1 = g*g

upper chamber dimensions are multiples of the golden ratio.

Dustin Carr physicist

Claude Genzling , polytechniqe Graduate

Jean leclant Dea of egyptology

Thierry de Champris, book The geometric verb"

Cheops pyramideon is exact scale model of pyramid at giza.

Agathargiz 2000 years ago argued ....

atronomer and priest TH Moreux in his book La Science Mysterieuse Des pharaons

subtract inner circel from outer = speed of light in 299,72 meters



author - David hatcher childres the lost cities series of books

colin wilson, From atlantis to the sphinx

richard Noone, Author of book 5/5/2000 . Uses hydrolic techniques to set stones using water pressure. edward concel desiphered .

www.atlantisrising.com


Gerald Hawkins mathematician, stonehenge could predict moon and solar eclipses

In 17th century william stookley and john aubreyn noted that ancient sites perfectly alligned along straight tracks. Alfred Watkins photographs discovered the ley system of straight lines connecting sites. studied by author John Michell, author of The New View Over Atlantis

tracks connected othery, trull, cadbury, brent tor, st. Michael's mount


brass couplings found at inca blocks before brass age was supposed to be.


dinosaurs 50min

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=xDKvlWTqlMk&feature=endscreen


=== oil ===http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/creationist-paper-published-in-peer-reviewed-biology-journal-ud-author-cited-origins-2012-conference/


http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html radio active decay

http://creation.com/fossil-magnetism-reveals-rapid-reversals-of-the-earths-magnetic-field

Even recently, I became aware of a disturbing magnetic anomaly affecting the Hubble space telescope because the Earth’s magnetic field is decaying. These are circumstantial clues about the youthfulness of some of the Earth’s features (if not the youthfulness of the entire Earth). 

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/08/24/newly-discovered-oileating-microbe-flourishing-gulf/ Oil eating bacteria would have consumed all the oil if it were millions of years old.

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/creationist-paper-published-in


http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/4-Power-Questions-to-Ask-an-Evolutionist,5701,229.aspx


1. Where did the universe’s original matter come from? 2. How did life begin? 3. Where are all the supposed transitional fossils between the Precambrian and Cambrian periods? 4. Where did the dinosaurs come from? 5. ------------------


creation moments Edit

Notes: John Allen Watson. 1991. "Phosphate Rocks/Bone Phosphates of South Carolina." The Ark Today, VI:5, Nov./Dec., pp. 14-19. Photo: Hadrosaurus, considered to be the first mounted dinosaur skeleton in the world. Today's Featured Product

Breathtaking Birds: Marvels of Creation This beautiful and colorful book showcases the unique characteristics of some of the most amazing birds of the world. Every bird has its special design feature highlighted in both the main text and a "fact box" at the... Find Out More Free Church Bulletin Inserts Free Book

http://www.creationmoments.com/radio/transcripts/proof-humans-and-dinosaurs-together


sea Edit

http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1112641006/ufo-lying-on-the-bottom-of-the-baltic-sea/

A Swedish expedition team has found an unidentified object at the bottom of the Baltic Sea, leaving some to believe it’s the remnants of an extra-terrestrial ship. Scientists went off on a deep-water dive to debunk some theories about the underwater object, but were left with more questions than they had answers. The divers found that the object was raised about 10 to 13 feet above the seabed, and curved in at the sides. “First we thought this was only stone, but this is something else,” Ocean X team diver Peter Lindberg said in a press release. The object had an egg shaped hole leading into it from the top, working like an opening. On top of the object, they found strange stone circle formations, which resembled small fireplaces. The stones were covered in something that resembled “soot.”

redOrbit (http://s.tt/1f30R)

mummy Edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_heLdTzKfCY&feature=uploademail mummy with caucusaoid features, predated indian tribes.


Hamcock Edit

graehamhancock.com from youtube

See Graham's book Fingerprints of the Gods: |US- http://amzn.to/x7PNY3 |UK- http://amzn.to/A7Sq8c |CA- http://amzn.to/wwmPZ0


Graham Hancock Presentation at the 2012 Tipping Point Prophets

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mHe211mLV0&feature=g-vrec 40min fid


get teh forbidden archeology coast-to-coast am torrent from piratebay

NOTE:ctc am utters lots of unsubstantiated conjectures, with some interesting facts inbetween.

do a search on the username uploader

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=jhenLmAzs6Y&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ0ViMVxKZA&feature=related 12000 old structure

Links Edit

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25723-massive-ocean-discovered-towards-earths-core A reservoir of water three times the volume of all the oceans has been discovered deep beneath the Earth’s surface. The finding could help explain where Earth’s seas came from.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BlbujJbbJo Ten unexplained mysteries, vanished mummy, iron pillar delhi,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVSx2wTZ3UU Dinosaurs and Humans lived contemporaneously. Trex soft tissue found.

Forbidden archaeology Cremo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hEnGnFwoAw , http://lah.ru/index-eng.htm Huge Underground Megaliths discovered in Caucasus, Russia. Vadim Chernobrov expedition. Stones stacked similar in proximity as the Giza Pyramid blocks, nothing can be inserted between them. Underground structure shape(like a bottle) ,huge blocks 3x2 m, It was built above ground , but got buried under ground by some event(probably Noah's flood). These underground chambers are the same size as Giza and have narrow passages similar to Giza, that can only be explored by small mobile robots. 25min (possible hoax, the other videos are absurd, no GPS coordinates given etc..)

http://talc.site88.net/mega.htm   site88 megalithic structures 

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.