Prof. Herrmann at http://www.raherrmann.com wrote ".....A language, as we know it, if improperly applied along with classical logic can lead to meaningless statements when meaningful phrases are employed....The fact that there exists millions of meaningless statements in the sense of classical logic is relevant in that it shows that the descriptive power of any human language is limited...
Recursive grammar Edit
http://bankofnotes.com/2012/01/04/fooled-by-randomness-nassim-nicholas-taleb/ “(T)here are Monte Carlo generators designed to structure such texts and write entire papers. Fed with ‘postmodernist’ texts, they can randomize phrases under a method called recursive grammar, and produce grammatically sound but entirely meaningless sentences that sound like Jacques Derrida, Camille Paglia, and such a crown.” (73)
Sokal hoax Edit
"My article is a melange of truth, half truth, quarter-truths, falsehoods, non-sequiturs, and syntactically correct sentences that have no meaning whatsoever." (Sokal, 1996.) "It took me a lot of writing and rewriting before the article reached the desired level of unclarity." (Mukerjee, 1998, p. 18.)
http://ssis.arts.unsw.edu.au/tsw/D34Sokal.html "....Predictably a thriving academic sub-industry has since grown up interpreting the event! (Roberts, 1997/8, p. 24.) One is reminded of the celebrated painting later revealed to have been the work of chimps ......"
- Mukerjee, M., (1998), "Undressing the emperor", Scientific American, March, 17-18.
- Kamiya, G., (1998), "Transgressing the boundaries; Towards a Transormativbe Hermeneutics.... ".
Hoax paper accepted Edit
- "....We are trying to relate the analytic thinking required in focused conference sessions, to the synthetic thinking, required for analogies generation, which calls for multi-focus domain and divergent thinking. We are trying to promote a synergic relation between analytically and synthetically oriented minds, as it is found between left and right brain hemispheres, by means of the corpus callosum....."
Stribling's paper consisted of randomly generated buzzwords munged into complete English sentences by a madlib-like program, so they were grammatically correct but meaningless: much like one of Jonathan Schwartz's weblog entries(Giant Shrimp), or a Cory Doctorow novel.
Dr.Fox lecture Edit
The famous Dr. Fox effect:
- "....[T]he overriding influence of instructor expressiveness on students' evaluation of college and university teaching...." (Marsh, 1987; the original Dr. Fox, a professional actor, delivered a contentless lecture to an audience of educators and graduate students who subsequently rated him very favorably; see Naftulin, Ware & Donnelly, 1973).
- Marsh, Herbert W. (1987) "Dr. Fox" Studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 331-336.
- Naftulin, D. H., Ware, J. E. & Donnelly, F. A. (1973) The Doctor Fox lecture: A Paradigm of Educational Seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 630-635.
- ..Natural Selection mimics intelligence...- Stephen Meyer. If ns mimics intelligence then why can't it mimic stupidity?
- ... Natural Selection is blind... - Kenneth Miller If ns is blind then why isn't it stupid?
- .... Plenty of variation for natural selection to work on .... Is work being used in the Pattern or design sense by Dawkins.
- '... A unit of selection is a biological entity within the hierarchy of biological organisation... - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_selection. bio-evolution doesn't yet cut-it as real science, lacking a fundamental operator ( such as d/dx ) to express the verbally stated concept of "selection" - http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Bio-evolution_lacks_both_a_dynamic_and_an_object
- ... a free-rider is a trait that could have been acted upon by selection,... - PatternOrDesign,Jerry Fodor
- .... by the process of natural selection .... Decisions can be thoughtful, hasty, slow , reluctant but not 'natural' - DernavichInfidels
- ...Look — Field studies attempting to measure natural selection inevitably report weak to non-existent selection effects.... - David Berlinski . Is selection a cause or an effect in terms of Pattern or design.
- ..... natural selection cannot increase information .... . This is a favorite amongst my fellow YEC brethren in the Lord Jesus. They are sadly more confused then the atheists. Whatever the reason for information decrease/increase in genes, it has nothing to do with anything getting naturaled. - Robot1
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=cIZAAh_6OXg - Ben Stein movie around 42min on Natural Selection - http://www.expelledexposed.com/index.php/the-truth/evolution
- ....Natural selection cannot explain the origin of genes because there was no information for natural selection to act on..... - http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/natural-selection-vs-evolution . My comment on this is that ns as a claim of logic doesn't "act" on anything, because tautologies cannot be experienced. Berlinski noted in his book Black Mischief first edition that ns comes across as a strange force like concept.
- ... explain how Natural Selection leads to increased Fitness1... Which is like asking one to explain how square circles leads to increased equilibrium or 'explain' how a traffic light can be both red and green at the same time. We need to consider that by definition a decision or selection can't be natural - Preferential decision. A decision can be preferential where 'natural' is used as a metaphor for preferential. The English language is a metaphorical marshmallow.
- ...Julio cranks his wooden cheese...
- .... Colorless green ideas sleep furiously ... Colorless green, Chomsky
- ....couldn't account for human intelligence purely by the action of selection... If by selection we mean survival, then we have a cause-effect inversion. Survival is an effect, not a cause - Chomsky#selection_all_about_survival
- Shakespear formulated many meaningless sentences, tricking scholars into trying to make sense of it. It is very poetic but like Aquinas Thomistic theses inebriated semantic fog.
- Nassim Taleb Verbose prose that masks valid points on Black swan events. Will list meaningless sentences as time allows.
- "...Active purposeful behavior is then either feedback teleological on non-teleological..." - meaningless http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purpose or http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purpose&oldid=469760588 . See Purpose1.
- ...evolutionary biologists may be deluding themselves if they think they have a good handle on the typical strength of selection in nature....http://creationwiki.org/Natural_selection Who did the selecting?
Dissimilar terms describe same conceptEdit
natural preservation, accumulation, selection or survival are used to formulate different sentences that refer to the same concept. A 'natural preservation' can still pass as meaningful, not so with 'natural selection', unless we mean Preferential decision. Lets formulate PatrickMatthew's and MalThus meaningful idea natural means of competitive selection using accumulation, survival(HenryFairfieldOsborn) or Darwin's preferred term preservation.
- By a natural(unintended) competitive survival process the strong survived over the weak to dominate an ecological niche.
- By a natural competitive accumulation process the strong survived over the weak to dominate an ecological niche.
- By a natural competitive preservation process the strong survived over the weak to dominate an ecological niche.
- By a natural competitive domination process the strong survived over the weak to dominate an ecological niche.
- By a natural competitive selection process the strong survived over the weak to dominate an ecological niche.
Survival, accumulation, preservation etc. are dissimilar terms that can replace selection to still reflect the core Popper unfalsifiable ideas of JamesHutton, MalThus and Matthew's. Strong <=> survived , says the same thing twice, if the other animal survived we would be told the same story. It is formulated so that its truth cannot be disputed, making it a logical fallacy from which any conclusion is a non-sequitur.
The Blank SwanEdit
NOTES: The Author of the http://www.amazon.com/Blank-Swan-End-Probability/dp/0470725222 uses contingency for uncertainty. From a Platonic primary binary contrast position there is only uncertainty(probability) and certainty in the financial markets. He wants to go ..... beyond contingency.... meaning he wants to introduce some third option to certainty/uncertainty dichotomy, like with "selection's" biological definition in dictionaries beginning around 1940, which from the KJV YEC Pattern or design dichotomy premise doesn't exist. It is possible that vast sections of his book were generated using recursive grammar software that generates grammatically correct but meaningless sentences as is done at http://writing-program.uchicago.edu/toys/randomsentence/index.htm
- “The market, once its name is uttered, can only itself become the source and itself become the given.”
- “To mediate contingency, we will need to be in a place of an ‘exchanging’ and invaginating nature; we will need a relation with literally no interior, what Deleuze calls the ‘self of difference’.”
- “A path may be opened from inside Kant’s correlational circle.”
- “If the exchange lies at the heart of the other... if it is indeed the other of ontology... then un-totalization will obtain.”
- “The impossible exchange of absolute contingency will be made possible by embedding the exchange in the very molecule of the medium.”
- “The market surface is the reciprocal of the thought of the absolute.”
- "....Contingency is the writing/trading thread that we keep pursuing despite the fact that the context has been saturated by replication....."
William Russell commented:
- '....That's a great sentence. Unfortunately, it took me two days of thinking before I understood it. This is an interesting book, but it is not a leisurely read for the average Joe.....'
Notes: William Russell should consider that in trying to sound clever and over-awh with rhetorical wit , one could actually wind up writing grammatically correct but meaningless nonsense that obfuscates what might be a valid concept.
Gianantonio Bissaro wrote:
- The author wrote in some blog that his "ideas" are so advanced that it will take years for people to understand them (I quote literally: "I don't expect my writings to make sense to you immediately; they probably won't before a few years"). ....... I think that all clever readers have already realized what is here to be understood. Nothing, unfortunately
Further meaningless nonsense: http://books.google.co.za/books?id=QkJSt_2UmL8C&pg=PT165&lpg=PT165&dq=derrida+blank+swan&source=bl&ots=Kwn1Bpo5mq&sig=ynF79ZrtQ_Jxn94q1AxCH066Ci4&hl=en&ei=PouETvO9EsedOvXyrNUB&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
- ...History is faster than possibility and harder than conceptual, thought, which knows only possibility...
Notes:. History is an effect and never repeats itself, because each generation has different circumstances, other than that the sentence is obvious meaningless hubris. Forex traders try to identify repeating patterns. A sensible discussion as to the difference between historical events and repeating patterns as it relates to survivalist bias, forwarding looking bias and data-snooping bias can only be explored in terms of the YEC Pattern or design premise.
Ayache wrote: ".....In sum, if we define a market (of contingent claims) as a place where contingent claims of every level of complexity trade simultaneously, at prices that are not redundant which each other, then you will find that you can never capture this in a picture with defined states. People commonly think that there is such a picture, only it changes and expands over time. This is exactly what I dispute, for, in my mind, the definition of market is instantaneous (all contingent claims must instantly trade non redundantly)......"
A podcast on BFM Malaysia from Ayache http://www.bfm.my/elie-ayache-the-blank-swan.html
My most recent published article by Ayache: http://www.ito33.com/whitepapers/1007_ayache.pdf
Ayache wrote: ".......Finally, the Wilmott forum where my book is under very hot and interesting discussion (I am "numbersix"): http://www.wilmott.com/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=76822&forumid=1 ...."
http://readingthemarkets.blogspot.com/2010/08/ayache-blank-swan-end-of-probability.html ".... Ayache’s swan is blank because “the writing process and the pricing process are two special kinds of processes that do not take place in possibility or in probability, like the traditional stochastic processes ... For this reason, their Swan bird, or the event that gives them wings, is BLANK. It is neither Black nor White; it is neither loaded with improbability nor with probability. It can only be filled with writing, as when we say ‘to fill in the blanks’.” (p. xv) ....."
http://readingthemarkets.blogspot.com/2010/08/ayache-blank-swan-end-of-probability.html "....I thought it was important to make this clarification, because there are indeed, for the time being, 'only a handful of people in the world who are capable of fully understanding and appreciating my book' ....."
Ayache's denial of Platonic ratiocination leads to his delusions of grandeur: "....I thought it was important to make this clarification, because there are indeed, for the time being, 'only a handful of people in the world who are capable of fully understanding and appreciating my book' ....."
Only a fool would think that anybody is capable of understanding the meaningless sentences from the twisted mind of Ayache.
Function in biology Edit
- ...A function is the reason some object or process occurred in a system that evolved through a process of selection or Natural selection. Thus, function refers forward from the object or process, along some chain of causation, to the goal or success. Compare this to the mechanism of the object or process, which looks backward along some chain of causation, explaining how the feature occurred...Function is not the same as purpose in the teleological sense....... Evolution is a blind process which has no 'goal' for the future.
Rephrased in English: ...Function looks forward and mechanism looks backward.... Which is meaningless nonsense.
If evolution is a blind process then why isn't it stupid? Are Ken Miller's blind natural selection (which apparently isn't stupid) the same thing as evolution. If perhaps both evolution and natural selection are blind but not stupid in what why would the one be the mechanism while the other not?
Functionality must be explored under the D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson's Composite Integrity or Irreducible Functionality, the interplay between complexity, redundancy and functionality representing a pattern with a purpose or mechanism as interpreted in terms of the Pattern or design dichotomy. Ref , Tautological Oxymorons
- http://alife.co.uk/essays/evolution_sees/ Meaningless sentences
Nytimes blog Edit
See Politics and the English language http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/23/zombie-nouns/ Contrast Beer’s vigorous prose with the following passage from a social sciences book: The partial participation of newcomers is by no means “disconnected” from the practice of interest. Furthermore, it is also a dynamic concept. In this sense, peripherality, when it is enabled, suggests an opening, a way of gaining access to sources for understanding through growing involvement. The ambiguity inherent in peripheral participation must then be connected to issues of legitimacy, of the social organization of and control over resources, if it is to gain its full analytical potential.
Epicureans are playing with Henry Morris, Ken Ham, Dembski, Behe etc. like a cat plays with a mouse.Ken Ham, Dawkins, Behe, Dembski etc are deceived, this though doesn't invalidate their world views necessarily. YEC is correct because the Masoretic says so - Godel's incompleteness theorem, Godelian Wall. One can accept with one's heart what the Textus Receptus says based the testimony of its authors - Bible isn't defined.
The Meaningless sentence litmus test is used to take down theists and especially YEC, excluding them from medical studies etc. Christians are denying their faith in Christ by using Meaningless sentences. It is becoming ever more impossible to be accepted into a trade guild without passing the Epicurean Meaningless sentence litmus test. For those who love the truth and abhor Meaningless sentences it will become eventually impossible to obtain any sort of academic qualification from Epicurean government officials. Many government schools will fail children if they refuse to use Meaningless sentence, a form of Stasi like persecution, via unrelenting psychological pressure.
http://www.thecrazyaustralian.com/un-meaningless-sentences/ This resonates with me, had to impose some sort of meaning on the grammatical gargoyle Natural Selection because it is so entrenched, finally managed to do this with preferential decision, which reflects the Pattern or design world view.
- http://blogandnot-blog.blogspot.com/2010/06/are-meaningless-sentences-and-bicycles.html '...Meaningless sentences aren't the sort of thing to which truth talk meaningfully applies...'
Cosmological natural selection =Edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Smolin So, in a sense, fecundity cosmological natural selection is one where universes could die off before successfully reproducing, just as any biological being can die without having offspring.
Wikipedia never defines natural selection Edit
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection Natural selection is the nonrandom process by which biologic traits become more or less common in a population as a function of differential reproduction of their bearers. It is a key mechanism of evolution.
We are told that something labeled 'natural selection' is the non-random process, but aren't informed as to what this Natural Selection is. If we replace natural selection with preferential decision the Epicureans object and say that natural selection doesn't mean this, which is correct because Sentences have no meaning. They don't know what it is they mean with natural selection as observed by Jerry Fodor in his LRB book review .... what then is the intended meaning of natural selection.....the question is wide open as of this writing.... On his blogging heads podcast he stated: ... if you scratch two biologists you will get two different definitions of natural selection....
This is a strong indication that the real problem we are dealing with is a world view trying to incorporate volitional type language to express that volition, purpose or will are illusions resulting in meaningless sentences.